Constitutional Law and Governance
Parliamentary accountability, federalism, and the structural limits of executive power. Analysis of constitutional design, gubernatorial conduct, legislative process, and institutional reform.
Independent legal analysis. Evidence-based policy work. Practitioner insight.
LexMentor's research and policy advisory work brings practitioner insight to India's most pressing legal and governance questions. Led by Advocate Aditya Sharma, a practising advocate and legal educator, we produce independent legal analysis, contribute to public consultations, and support organisations working at the intersection of law, governance, and public interest.
Our work is non-partisan, evidence-based, and oriented toward the public good.
Parliamentary accountability, federalism, and the structural limits of executive power. Analysis of constitutional design, gubernatorial conduct, legislative process, and institutional reform.
Regulatory frameworks for emerging technologies, platform accountability, and fundamental rights in digital spaces. Covers data protection, AI regulation, deepfakes, and online free speech.
Reform and implementation of India's criminal law framework, including analysis of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and Sakshya Adhiniyam. Pre-trial rights, bail reform, and access to justice.
Structural critique of legal pedagogy in India, the state of legal aid, and the gap between legal entitlements and their realisation for ordinary citizens.
Bill tracking, legislative commentary, and regulatory review. Structured analysis of draft legislation, subordinate rules, and consultation papers issued by government and regulatory bodies.
Short-form, accessible policy documents for non-specialist audiences including governments, civil society organisations, and institutions working on law reform and governance improvement.
Research papers, policy briefs, consultation submissions, and downloadable legal writing.
A research paper examining whether protection from extreme heat and meaningful access to cooling can be located within Article 21 and the constitutional guarantee of life with dignity.
A submission examining proposed incorporation rules and their implications for corporate governance and regulatory compliance.
A submission prepared for international human rights consideration on law, governance, and public interest concerns.
A policy brief examining governance standards, regulatory accountability, and institutional design in the financial regulatory context.
A submission analysing digital regulation, platform accountability, and rights-based concerns under the information technology framework.
A consultation submission reviewing the proposed mineral exchange rules and their implications for regulatory design and market governance.
Open-access writing published on LexMentor.
A constitutional and regulatory examination of deepfakes, platform design, and free speech in India.
A structural account of gubernatorial assent and federal accountability under India's parliamentary Constitution.
A curated analysis of recent constitutional and criminal law decisions with implications for law reform.
The intensification of climate change and the recurrence of extreme urban heat events have created unprecedented challenges for human survival and dignity in India’s metropolitan centres. Within this evolving jurisprudential framework, this paper seeks to advance the argument for recognising a “Right to Cool” as an essential facet of Article 21 in the era of climate change. Urban heat does not impact all citizens uniformly. The brunt is borne by vulnerable populations such as informal workers, slum dwellers, children, and the elderly, whose lack of access to affordable and sustainable cooling aggravates their exposure to heat-related risks. By engaging with India’s National Cooling Action Plan, the paper estimates whether statutory and policy initiatives adequately reflect constitutional mandates. The analysis draws on international human rights law and comparative jurisprudence to show how the state’s positive obligations extend to protecting thermal comfort as part of the right to health and the right to the environment. Ultimately, the study argues that judicial acknowledgement of “Right to Cool” would not only represent a logical extension of existing Article 21 jurisprudence but also reinforce India’s commitment to climate justice and human rights. Such recognition would compel both policy innovation and institutional accountability in addressing one of the most vital challenges of urban life in the twenty-first century.
If you represent a think-tank, NGO, academic institution, law firm, or government body and are interested in research collaboration or policy advisory work, use the form below or write directly to contact.lexmentor@gmail.com
LexMentor operates as an independent initiative. Research and advisory work is undertaken selectively, based on alignment with public interest values and available research capacity. We do not accept engagements that compromise editorial independence or involve partisan or commercial advocacy.